ABSTRACT
Introduction: Malignancies are a major complication of heart transplant (HT). Noninvasive surveillance after HT using gene expression (GEP) profiling and donor derived cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) are noninferior to biopsy and are widely utilized. The interpretation of % dd-cfDNA, is not well understood in malignancies with a conceptual increase in the recipient fraction. The effect of chemotherapy on GEP in the setting of post-HT surveillance has not been described to the best of our knowledge. Hypothesis: Induction of chemotherapy will cause global transcriptional reduction in GEP. Method(s): GEP was performed with AlloMap (AM, CareDx), which evaluates expression levels of 11 mononuclear cell genes, involved in lymphocyte activation, T-cell priming, cell migration, hematopoietic proliferation, steroid sensitivity, and platelet activation. Scores range from 0-40, higher scores have a stronger correlation with rejection. At our center a total of 995 draws were analyzed from 2019-2022. In parallel dd-cfDNA, which informs about graft injury was analyzed using AlloSure (AS, CareDx). Case Events: A 71-year-old male HT recipient for nonischemic cardiomyopathy and no rejection history was diagnosed with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma at 16 months post-HT. Following diagnosis, mycophenolic acid was stopped, prednisone 5 mg was started, and tacrolimus trough goal was gradually lowered to 4-6 given infectious complications. Palliative chemotherapy with folinic acid, fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) was initiated at 18 months post-HT with planned dose reduction of oxaliplatin and holding of 5-FU bolus to reduce risk of myelosuppression given comorbidities. Oxaliplatin was stopped at 18 months post HT. Due to COVID he last received 5-FU at 33 months post-HT. Graft function remained stable and DSA negative. At 36 months post-HT, he developed a bowel obstruction without surgical options for interventions and expired shortly thereafter. Result(s): With initiation of prednisone and following chemotherapy there was a drastic decrease in AM scores (Fig. A). Steroid therapy led to an 18% decline in AM scores, the greatest decrease occurred with chemotherapy, with 67% decline from the mean when compared to all center patients (Fig B). Dd-cfDNA levels remained stable during the course aside from one early elevation. Conclusion(s): To the best of our knowledge this is the first published case on the effect of chemotherapy on GEP profiling in the setting of post-HT surveillance. This case advises caution when interpreting GEP in the setting of chemotherapy showing great reduction in GEP scores. While dd-cfDNA levels remained relatively stable after malignancy diagnosis and treatment initiation further studies will need to inform on the use of both GEP and dd-cfDNA in these patients.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Background: Interest in organ preservation (OP) strategies for rectal cancer (RC) patients persists. The efficacy of long course chemoradiation (LCRT) vs. short course radiation therapy (SCRT) relative to OP is unknown. We compared OP rates between SCRT and LCRT total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies. Method(s): During the COVID-19 pandemic we established an institutional SCRT mandate with no exceptions. For comparison, we identified RC patients treated with LCRT immediately before and after the mandate period. After completion of TNT, patients were restaged by clinical exam, endoscopy, and MRI. A watch and wait (WW) approach was recommended for patients with a clinical complete response (cCR), defined by the MSK regression schema. Total mesorectal excision (TME) was recommended for non-cCR patients. OP was defined as alive, TME-free, and with no evidence of disease in the pelvis. We performed survival analysis for: local regrowth rate, OP, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Result(s): We identified 563 consecutive patients with RC treated with TNT, of whom 231 were excluded due to either metastatic disease, synchronous/metachronous malignancies, or non-adenocarcinoma histology (Jan. 2018-Jan. 2021). Patient and tumor characteristics were similar in the LCRT (n = 256) and SCRT (n = 76) cohorts. No significant differences in high-risk features were noted. Most patients had clinical stage III disease (82% in LCRT vs. 83% in SCRT). Induction chemotherapy followed by consolidative radiation was the most common treatment order (78% (LCRT) vs. 70% (SCRT)). The median interval from end of TNT to clinical restaging was 8 weeks (LCRT) and 9 weeks (SCRT). The cCR rate was 46% in both cohorts. The cCR rate was numerically higher in patients treated with radiation first, as compared to chemotherapy first (53% vs. 44% (LCRT) and 52% vs. 43% (SCRT)). Among patients with a cCR, the likelihood of WW management was similar (98% (LCRT) vs. 94% (SCRT)). From start of TNT, the median follow-up was 32 and 28 months respectively for LCRT and SCRT. The 2-year OS (95% vs. 92%), DFS (78% vs 70%), and distant recurrence (20% vs. 21%) rates were similar. Among all patients, the 2-year OP rate was 40% (95% CI 35-47%) for LCRT and 29% (95% CI 20-42%) with SCRT. In those patients managed by WW, the 2-year local regrowth rate was 20% (95% CI 12-27%) with LCRT vs. 36% (95% CI 16-52%) with SCRT. Conclusion(s): In this nonrandomized comparison, while cCR rates were similar, we observed a numerically higher OP rate with LCRT-TNT than with SCRT-TNT. The ongoing ACO/ARO/AIO-18.1 trial, hypothesizing that LCRT-TNT will increase OP rates relative to SCRT-TNT, should definitively answer this question.
ABSTRACT
Background: During the COVID19 pandemic, many centres in the UK, shifted towards utilising hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) to pancreas. We aim to report the UK experience hypofractionated (3-5 fractions) RT to the pancreas from 7 centres in the UK. Rates of toxicity, progression, death and potential prognostic factors were assessed. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed. Results: 92 patients from 7 centres were included in the analysis (median age 71 (range 49-88). 90% had performance status of 0-1. 66% had locally advanced disease. 53% had RT delivered over 3- 5 fractions (n = 49, median: 30Gy/5f, range:30- 40Gy in 3-5f). The rest had 15-fraction RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy (n = 43, median: 45Gy/15f, range: 36-45Gy/15f). Induction chemotherapy (CT) was used in 64% (FOLFIRINIOX -42/59). Median follow-up was 13 months from first treatment (induction CT or RT). Median overall survival (OS) among all patient was 17 months, (95% CI-14.5-19.5 months). On multivariable analysis, induction CT was the only predictor of improved PFS (median survival (MS) 12 vs 5 months;hazard ratio [HR] 0.23;95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-0.44, p < 0.001) and OS (MS 24 vs 11 months;HR 0.15;95% CI: 0.07 - 0.34, p < 0.001). There were no deaths. 4 patients had grade 3+ toxicities (transaminitis, cholecystitis and gall bladder perforation, small bowel obstruction and diarrhoea) -all had concurrent CT. Conclusions: Our survival outcome appears to be comparable with published data from CT + concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Induction CT appears to improve outcome. Careful selection of patients can help maximise advantage in this patient population.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) is one of the mostcommon haematological malignancies in adults. Molecular mutationsin AML are major determinants of the patient's response to therapyand outcomes. Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) confers a good prognosiswhile fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 gene (FLT3-ITD) is associated witha poor prognosis.Aims &Objectives: To study the prognostic molecular markers andcytogenetics of all newly diagnosed and de novo AML cases andassess the impact of the same on treatment outcome.Materials &Methods: 23 patients with newly diagnosed (adult andpaediatric) de novo AML from Jan 2021 to Aug 2021 at GauhatiMedical College, Guwahati were included in this study. We analysedthe bone marrow aspirates, clinical significance of NPM1, CEBPA,FLT3 (by real time PCR) with disease progression. Cytogenetics bykaryotyping and immunophenotypic parameters were also documented and corelated with disease progression.Result: There were (12/23)52.2% males and (11/23)47.8% female. 2patients (8.7%) were positive for FLT3 and 4(17.4%) were positivefor NPM1. (7/23)30.4% patients had t(8,21) of which 3 had normalkaryotype while 2 patients (8.7%) had turner's genotype(45,X). 4patients (17.4%) expired while receiving Induction chemotherapy, ofwhich one had 45,X,t(8,21)genotype, one had NPM1 mutation andone expired during 3 rd cycle of consolidation due to covid 19pneumonia. 6(26.1%) patients had treatment failure following intensive induction therapy of which 2 had t(8,21) with normalkaryotype(40%) and one had NPM1 mutation with wildtype FLT3.All patients with NPM1 mutation were negative for CD34 andHLADR. All patients with NPM1 and FLT3 uniformly expressed CD33.Conclusions: 3/6 patients had failure of induction in spite of havingstandard risk cytogenetics. So, next generation sequencing (NGS) iswarranted upfront for all diagnosed AML cases. It should now beincorporated as a standard of care in the management of AML. Onepatient with turner's genotype and t(8,21) expired during inductiontherapy, hence, prognostic significance of 45,X needs to be furthervalidated in AML.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Obinutuzumab-based induction immunochemotherapy was demonstrated to improve the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) comparing to the regimens with rituximab in GALLIUM study (NCT01332968). The infusion related reactions (IRRs) occur in more than half of FL patients during the first obinutuzumab administration. Therefore, during the whole treatment period infusions lasting more than 3-4 hours are so far recommended. Shorter infusions would be more convenient for both patients and medical staff and could also contribute to the shorter hospitalization that is desirable during COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the study was to evaluate the tolerance and early efficacy of obinutuzumab-based regimens in FL patients in clinical practice. Methods: We evaluated tolerability of obinutuzumab infusions and response rates to different regimens of chemotherapy combined with obinutuzumab in consecutive FL patients treated in hemato-oncology centers in Poland from Jan 2020 to Jan 2021. Obinutuzumab was combined with CHOP, CVP or bendamustine according to the treating physician choice. Obinutuzumab maintenance was offered to the patients who achieved at least partial response (PR) after induction immunochemotherapy. Response was evaluated with computed tomography or positron emission tomography according to 2014 Lugano criteria. Adverse events were assessed according to Common Toxicity Criteria (version 5). Results: The study group included 129 treatment-naive FL patients. The median age (range) was 52 (29 - 90) years, 35.7% of patients were males. According to FLIPI 46.5 % of patients were classified as high risk, 33.3% as intermediate and 20.2% as low risk, whereas 33.7%, 30.4% and 35.9% of patients were in PRIMA PI high, intermediate and low risk groups, respectively, Table 1. Median number of GELF criteria was 2 (range 1-6). Induction chemotherapy included: CVP in 48.1% (n=62), CHOP in 29.5% (n=38) and Benda in 22.5% (n=29) of patients. Median number of cycles was 6 (range 1 - 8). Maintenance was started in 85 patients (76.6%). The first obinutuzumab dose was administered as a single infusion during the first day of the first cycle in 43.4% of patients (n=56), whereas 56.6 % (n=73) of patients had initial infusion divided into 2 days (100 mg and 900 mg). During the first cycle 93.8% (n=121) of patients received three doses of obinutuzumab. The doses were omitted in 8 patients: in 4 due to Covid-19, in 1 due to pneumonia and neutropenia and in 3 cases due to neutropenia. IRRs were reported during the first Obinutuzumab administration in 10.1% of patients (n=13, grade 1/2 in 11 and grade 3 in 2 patients): in 7 patients who received obinutuzumab initial dose in single infusion and in 6 patients who received first obinutuzumab dose divided in two days. Median time of the first infusions was 4 hours and 55 min (range 1:30 - 9:45). There were no IRRs reported during the subsequent obinutuzumab infusions. The most common adverse event was neutropenia with grade 3/4 events reported in 51.1% of patients (n=66). G-CSF support was given in 70.4% (n = 81/115), and as the primary prophylaxis in 42.6 % (n=49) of patients. The SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in 19 patients regardless of initial chemotherapy regimen. After induction immunochemotherapy complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progression disease (PD) rates were: 71.8%, 23.9%, 0.9% and 3.4%, respectively, Table 2. With a median follow up of 8.7 months 5 patients (3.9%) relapsed, 4 died due to COVID infection. There were no deaths caused by FL. Conclusions: In our study obinutuzumab-based induction treatment was well tolerated. The low incidence and low grade of infusion related reactions in most of the patients, reported only during the first infusion, support the practice of administration of the first obinutuzumab dose in a single infusion. For convenience, the concept of short, 90 minutes infusion of Obinutuzumab starting from the second cycle could be considered (Canales MA, EHA 2021). During COVID-19 pandemic using obinutu umab with chemotherapy is feasible and justified by the high response rate to this treatment. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Paszkiewicz-Kozik: Roche: Honoraria, Other: congress fee;Servier: Other: congress fee;gillead: Other: travel grant;Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel Grants. Hus: Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding;Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Romejko-Jarosinska: roche: Other: congress fee;servier: Other: congress fee;gilead: Other: traver grant. Drozd-Sokolowska: AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dlugosz-Danecka: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding;Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Acerta Pharma: Research Funding;AbbVie: Research Funding;Macrogenics: Research Funding;Beigene: Research Funding;MEI Pharma: Research Funding;Incyte Corp.: Research Funding;Takeda: Research Funding. Lech-Marańda: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Walewski: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria;Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Patients with NHL have a longer duration of illness and higher mortality rate after infection with Covid-19 1-3. Vaccination is strongly recommended to mitigate these problems in the general population, however, patients with cancer were not eligible to enter the pivotal vaccine trials. Furthermore, patients with NHL as well as other hematologic malignancies are frequently treated with B cell depleting therapies (BCDT) such as Rituximab and other anti-CD20 antibodies which in theory affect antibody production after vaccination. There are no data in the literature regarding patients with NHL and scarce data on other tumors concerning the antibody response against the S protein of Sars-Cov-2. To investigate the production of antibodies against the spike protein following vaccination against Sars-Cov-2, we studied 180 patients with cancer. We also aimed to determine if factors such as timing of BCDT in relation to number of days elapsed between such treatment and vaccination, as well as other features such as peripheral blood absolute B cell count correlate with antibody production. Materials and Methods: Anti-spike protein antibody production was evaluated in 104 patients with NHL and 76 with other malignancies. Eligible participants were aged 21 years or older. Study inclusion criteria included diagnosis of lymphoma or other hematological malignancy as well as solid tumors. The Dimension Exel 200 method for qualitative detection of total antibodies was used to determine antibody production. The antibody test was performed > 14 days after the second Moderna or Pfizer vaccine dose or after the Johnson & Johnson single dose. We prospectively evaluated antibody production following administration of BCDT as well as cytotoxic chemotherapy in 104 patients with NHL, 27 hematologic malignancies and in 49 solid tumors. In addition, we explored the timing of such treatments in relation to the vaccination date as well as the type of vaccine administered. Results: Median age was 61 and 59% were females. Of 180 entered, 104 had NHL. Of these, 95 (91.3%) were treated with BCDT, including rituximab (89), obinutuzumab (5) or anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy (1). BCDT was usually given together with induction chemotherapy and followed by maintenance. Histologic types of NHL treated with these therapies were: aggressive NHLs (N=35), follicular low grade (N=33), marginal zone NHL (14) and others (N=13). There were 49 patients with solid tumors. We also included 10 patients with other hematologic tumors who received BCDT and were analyzed together with the 95 NHLs to determine if this treatment interfered with anti-spike antibody production. Conclusions: These results imply a deleterious effect of BCDT on the humoral immune response to the SARS-Cov-2 vaccine. The correlation between the administration of BCDT and poor production of anti-spike antibodies is very robust, particularly in those cases who were vaccinated 9 months or less after BCDT. However, administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy without BCDT was not associated with reduced production of antibodies. In fact, almost all patients (94%) who received cytotoxic chemotherapy without BCDT, produced antibodies against spike protein (table 2). However, when chemotherapy was combined with BCDT there was a significant reduction of antibody production. These results strongly suggest that the major problem with poor antibody production following vaccination against Sars-Cov-2 relates to the use of BCDT and not so much to cytotoxic chemotherapy. The same findings apply to the 104 cases of NHL where half of patients treated with BCDT did not produce antibodies while 88% who did not receive BCDT produced antibodies (table 2). Almost all patients with solid tumors in our study (95.9%) were able to produce antibodies, irrespective of whether they received chemotherapy or not. These data raise the question whether vaccinated patients treated with BCDT who failed to make antibodies against the spike protein, could also benefit from a third dose. [Formula presented] Disclosures: No elevant conflicts of interest to declare.
ABSTRACT
Background Based on early evidence of a high rate of coronavirus mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) undergoing intensive chemotherapy (IC), the national health service (NHS) in the United Kingdom temporarily made venetoclax available as an alternative therapy, with the aim of reducing both mortality and healthcare resource use. From late April 2020, venetoclax was available to patients aged >16y with NPM1 mutation without FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD), patients aged >50y with NPM1, IDH1 or IDH2 mutations (regardless of FLT3 status) and patients aged >60y without favourable-risk cytogenetics. Venetoclax could be given with either azacitidine or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), with the latter recommended mainly for patients with NPM1 mutation. We report a health-system-wide real world data collection for toxicity and patient outcomes across 65 NHS Hospitals. Methods Each patient was registered on a central NHS database. Clinicians certified that their patient met the above criteria, had not received previous AML treatment, and was fit for induction chemotherapy. Anonymised data were retrospectively collected by treating physicians. Venetoclax dose, duration and toxicity information was requested for the first 4 cycles of therapy. Response definitions were as per European Leukaemia Network (ELN) guidelines. A total of 870 patients have been registered on the scheme, with outcomes reported here for those with follow-up information at a data cut on 1st August 2021. Results There were 301 patients, median age 72y (range 34 - 90) with 62% male. The majority (81%) had an ECOG performance status of 0-1. AML was secondary to a previous haematological disorder in 33%, therapy-related in 10% and de novo in the remaining 57%. MRC cytogenetic risk was intermediate in 70% and adverse in 27%. NPM1 mutations were detected in 28% and FLT3-ITD in 12%. Next-generation sequencing results were available in 86% of patients, which detected mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 in 28%, ASXL1 in 20%, RUNX1 in 17% and TP53 in 12%. The ELN risk was favourable for 23%, intermediate for 30% and adverse for 44%. A majority received venetoclax in combination with azacitidine (85%), with the remaining 15% receiving LDAC. The LDAC cohort was enriched for de novo AML (76% vs 54%) and NPM1-mutated disease (56% vs 23%). Most patients (81%) followed the recommended initial schedule of venetoclax 100mg daily for 28 days in combination with posaconazole or voriconazole. Patients spent a median 14 days in hospital in cycle 1, then a median of 0 days for cycles 2-4. In cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4, the median number of days for recovery of neutrophils to >0.5x10 9/L was 33, 25, 24 and 14 respectively, and the median number of days to recovery of platelets to >50x10 9/L was 22, 3, 0 (no drop below 50) and 0. The composite complete remission (CR) / CR with incomplete haematological recovery (CRi) rate was 70%. MRD data is being collected. The best response was morphological leukaemia free state (MLFS) in 2%, partial remission in 7% and refractory disease in 11%. CR/CRi was higher in de novo (78%) compared to secondary AML (57%, p=0.02);NPM1 mutated (78% vs 67%, p=0.02) and IDH1/IDH2 mutated disease (85% vs 62%, p=0.02). ELN favourable risk patients had the highest CR/CRi rate (85%, intermediate 71%, adverse 60%, p=0.01). Median follow-up was 8.2 months (95%CI 7.8 - 9.0) with median overall survival (OS) 12.8 months (95%CI 10.9 - not reached). Mortality at day 30 was 5.7% and day 60 was 8.4%. 12-month overall survival was 51%, increasing to 71% in those who achieved CR/CRi. Survival was poorer in secondary (HR 1.9, p <0.01) and therapy-related AML (HR 2.1, p=0.02), better in NPM1 mutated (HR 0.6, p=0.02) and IDH mutated (HR 0.5, p=0.02) disease and poorer with TP53 mutation (HR 2.0, p=0.01). Overall survival did not differ for patients treated with LDAC compared to azacitidine (HR 1.1, p=0.7). Conclusion This large real-world study demonstrates CR/CRi and survival rates comparable to those reported in prospective clinical trials. Importantly, during t e COVID-19 pandemic, the adoption of venetoclax regimens permitted the great majority of treatment to be delivered as an outpatient with significant resource saving at a time of critically constrained inpatient resources. The data support prospective comparisons of venetoclax-based regimens to IC in fit adults with AML particularly in older patients with de novo AML, NPM1-mutated and IDH-mutated disease. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Belsham: Celgene: Other: meeting attendance;Abbvie: Other: meeting attendance. Khan: Abbvie: Honoraria;Astellas: Honoraria;Takeda: Honoraria;Jazz: Honoraria;Gilead: Honoraria;Novartis: Honoraria. Khwaja: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Latif: Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria;Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria;Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria;Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Takeda UK: Speakers Bureau. Loke: Pfizer: Honoraria;Amgen: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria;Novartis: Other: Travel;Daichi Sankyo: Other: Travel. Murthy: Abbvie: Other: support to attend educational conferences. Smith: ARIAD: Honoraria;Pfizer: Speakers Bureau;Daiichi Sankyo: Speakers Bureau. Whitmill: Daiichi-sankyo: Other: travel fees;EHA in stockholm: Other: conference support. Craddock: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board;Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dillon: Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Jazz: Other: Education events;Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: educational events;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Session chair (paid to institution), Speakers Bureau;Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Astellas: Consultancy, Other: Educational Events, Speakers Bureau;Amgen: Other: Research support (paid to institution);Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research Support, Educational Events.